Monday 28 May 2012

Equality, diversity and the Speaker of the House of Commons






On Friday 25th May I was fortunate enough to co-chair an event featuring the Rt. Hon. John Bercow MP, Speaker of the House of Commons. For those who aren’t sure the Speaker of the House of Commons is that fellow who sits in the big chair in the House of Commons and tells MP’s off when they over step the mark (like when David Cameron called Ed Balls a ‘muttering idiot' on PM’s question time last week). His role is to stay impartial and maintain order. As well as this he’s also doing some rather excellent work with the Parliamentary Outreach service to help improve public engagement in politics and improve equality and diversity in the House itself.

The event in question was a W.A.I.T.S (Women Acting in Today’s Society) Policy Forum on the opportunities for and barriers facing women wanting to get involved in politics (see my previous blog post http://henshouse1.blogspot.co.uk/2012/02/whats-problem-women-in-politics.html for a brief overview of the situation). Aside from Mr Speaker being delayed in traffic and arriving half an hour late the event was a great success, with the Policy Forum speakers and Mr Speaker himself delivering engaging, informative and occasionally amusing speeches and deftly answering challenging questions.



Our first speaker was Sharon Thompson. Sharon is currently a magistrate and has a vast amount of first-hand experience of the issues women, and especially mothers, face with wanting to get involved in politics. The key points that I took away from her presentation were:

1) There are two kinds of women local parties need to consider: those that are already engaged in politics and those that would make a fantastic contribution to the political scene but feel that they lack the knowledge (‘I don’t watch the politics show!’), skills or ability to make it. To help engage these women we need more successful female politicians to act as mentors and ‘pass the baton on’ to the next aspiring generation and more family and female friendly events. Things like low key, welcoming coffee mornings where women can get together in a friendly environment and chat about what makes them tick and how they can get more involved in party politics.

2) Parties need to raise awareness of political positions beyond just councillors and MP’s. Sharon made the point that there are loads of local party positions (such as women’s officer) that can represent fantastic ways for women who are interested in politics to gain a bit more experience without being shoved in at the deep end of the  MP or Councillor candidate selection and campaigning process. But hardly anyone knows about them.




Our next speaker was Ally Sultana. Ally is the Coordinator for Saheli Women's Group Empowerment Project which works to increase the understanding of politics and political structures amongst women in South Birmingham. She spoke passionately about the importance of politics and the difficult experiences of the women she had delivered training to on how to become a local councillor.

1) Ally began by talking about the experiences of the women she had worked with, saying that it’s not just the women who have to change but the parties themselves. After helping deliver training to South Birmingham women on how to become a local councillor, in line with parliamentary guidelines on the matter, many of the women were put off the political process by the in-fighting, pettiness and bickering that they had witnessed. If parties are serious about improving equality and diversity in their numbers, they need to be serious about changing their ways too.

2) Next Ally made the point that, if you’re going to run for candidacy you need to 1) know yourself and be confident that whatever the barrier you can get through, 2) build a vast support network around you. It’s a tough process and will involve a load of highs and lows, so you really can’t do it alone. Despite these difficulties and barriers, though, Ally concluded with an impassioned plea to the audience: get involved. Things won’t change until we make it happen so whatever you come up against, keep going and it’ll be worth it in the end.


Our final W.A.I.T.S Policy Forum speaker was Nura Ally. Nura is currently the Community Development Officer for the Hodge Hill constituency and founder and director of the Allies Network; a community organisation set up by women for disadvantaged women from ethnic minority backgrounds and communities in the West Midlands. She had some interesting advice and feedback based on her own experiences of competing for candidate selection:

1) The ‘tick box’ approach to equality is not always helpful. Nura felt that during the selection process there was far too much emphasis placed on the external qualities gender, race, sexuality, and not enough on what an individual can truly offer. She believed that a stronger set of guidelines to go alongside the process, weighting the importance of these external qualities against the individual’s personality and experience would help make the system fairer for all.

2) Like Ally, Nura called for all of the assembled audience to get more involved. Her own experiences may not have been difficulty free but that does not change that fact that she believes that it is every woman’s (and man’s) civic duty to get involved in politics. She asked that every audience member join a political party of their choice and start participating as it’s only through participation that change is going to occur.



Our final speaker of the morning was Mr Speaker himself, the Rt. Hon. John Bercow MP. Mr Bercow attended the W.A.I.T.S Policy forum as part of a series of events he was participating in in Birmingham that day as part of the Parliamentary outreach programme, aiming to bring Parliament to the people and helping make national politics national, not just London centric. The main theme of his speech was what Parliament is already doing, and what still needs to be done, to help make it more accessible to women.

1) He discussed changes he had insisted on already such as the creation of a nursery within the Houses of Parliament to help female employees and MP’s with young children. He also referred to the creation of ParliAble (a Parliamentary Disability Equality Network) and ParliOut (a support group for LGBT individuals) before talking about the female ‘movers and shakers’ of Parliament.

2) He then referred to what he felt were still key barriers facing women wanting to get involved in politics. First the anti-social work hours (on Mondays and Thursdays, for instance, Parliament opens at 2:30pm and ends at 10:30pm) which he felt should be swiftly dealt with. Secondly the ‘ya-boo’ (heckling) atmosphere of the House of Commons itself and the masculine ‘boys club’ attitude it can portray, which he hopes will be changed by more women striving to become candidates and thus more women making it into Parliament.




After this we moved onto a brief question and answer session in which the assembled audience excelled, asking tough and poignant questions and suggesting improvements to the system Mr Bercow should take back with him to Parliament. There were too many to list here so here’s just a few:

1) Job share MP’s? One lady had an interesting suggestion: in order to make high profile political positions more attractive to women Parliament could look a job share scheme. She argued that many women, especially in the public sector, manage to juggle advancing their careers with looking after young children by opting in to a job share position, so how about applying the idea to MP’s, divvying up the role so that one individual does the local constituency work and the other the Westminster role/varying combinations of the two?

2) How can we guarantee that the hard work Mr Speaker has put in to improving equality and Parliament outreach will be continued by his successor? This highly apt question had a very simple answer from Mr Bercow: we can’t. But on the plus side he plans on sticking around for a good few more years.

3) The selection process for MP’s is ridiculously expensive, requires a large amount of travelling and favours candidates with public speaking training and experience (i.e. private school or Ox-Bridge), what about a hardship fund and how about making the selection process as much about the person’s other abilities as it is about public speaking? Mr Bercow agreed with this statement but discussed the difficulties of getting either Parliament (and the public) to agree to putting a portion of tax payer’s money aside to help candidates of any party in dire financial need, or individual parties to put a portion of their funds towards an in party scheme.

At this point Mr Bercow was whisked off to his next appointment, already a little on the late side, and myself and the assembled audience were left to reflect on what had been said and what still needs to be done.




For me, I was personally genuinely impressed with Mr Bercow’s down to earth, often amusing approach to his role as speaker and his dedication to going out in to the community to engage with harder to reach groups. However, despite the leaps being made forward, I was left feeling that the fight for more women in Parliament is still an uphill struggle. Mr Speaker himself stated that just getting a nursery facility in place in Parliament came up against opposition and apathy, with many colleagues complaining ‘there’s nowhere we could put one’ (a statement proved glaringly untrue by the fact that there is now one in place). Likewise, the W.A.I.T.S Policy Forum speakers all depicted an image of local party politics that really needs to make more of an effort to become more approachable for women in ways that really would not require too much effort on their half (coffee mornings, mentoring, family friendly event times, fairer selection process). 93 years on from when the first female MP took her seat the proportion of women in Parliament remains stubbornly at just 22%. Only 37 out of Birmingham’s 120 local councillors are female. I’m very glad that someone is standing up for common sense policies to get more women involved in the political process but there’s a heck of a lot more work still to be done.

Fortunately the W.A.I.T.S Policy forum speakers seem more than willing to take on the challenge. Sharon, Ally and Nura are all carrying on their fantastic work either by running for political roles themselves or helping many other women discover their potential and take on greater roles of responsibility. On top of this in the post event networking several of the audience members declared their intention to get more involved in local politics and even go for candidate selection before the next local election too. We need more dedicated and inspiring women like these to keep building up the momentum and pushing for positive change in the UK. Luckily for us, if this event is anything to go by, we’ve got them in abundance.



H.B.
X

Thursday 24 May 2012

W.A.I.T.S. Women in Politics Event


So I haven't done any blog posts in a while, but it's not because I haven't been doing anything interesting; quite the contrary, it's been hectic. First up tomorrow morning I'm co-chairing a W.A.I.T.S Policy Forum event with the Speaker of the House of Commons, Rt. Hon. John Bercow MP. More details to follow after but, for now, here's  the press release for what's set to be a rather interesting event.



PRESS RELEASE



Women Acting In Today’ s Society ( WAITS)   is hosting a vist of  The Speaker of the House of Commons Rt Hon John Bercow MP   Friday May 25th  


Speaker of the House Of Commons Rt Hon John Bercow MP will be visiting Women Acting in Today’s Society (WAITS) as part of an outreach visit to Birmingham and Dudley.

The speaker will be hearing from members of WAITS Policy Forum who have experience of being involved in local politics and the most recent Council elections. 
                         
The speaker Rt Hon John Bercow MP will also be speaking at the Football League Community Trust Annual Conference at the NEC, attending a session of the Dudley Youth Council, and delivering the Frank Foley Memorial Lecture in Stourbridge. 

House of Commons Speaker, Rt Hon John Bercow MP said: “WAITS is involved in crucial work building the leadership skills of local women and supporting women affected by domestic abuse. For all the progress made in recent years to increase female participation in politics, we still have a long way to go. I am very much looking forward to the WAITS event and hearing the personal experiences of women involved in politics”.


About Women Acting In Todays Society WAITS:

WAITS is a registered charity established in 1993. WAITS mission is to enable women from diverse communities within the West Midlands to develop themselves and others. WAITS two main areas of work are:

1. Empowering Women- building the leadership skills of local women to engage more effectively with other women, groups, networks, policy makers and service providers.

2.  Women’s Support and Development Services – supporting women affected by domestic abuse, in particular BAME and Chinese women, through advocacy, counselling and Accommodation


For more information Contact Marcia Lewinson WAITS CEO marcia@waitsaction.org

Wednesday 2 May 2012

Why I'm Voting Yes to a Birmingham Mayor


*I would like to apologise in advance for any misspellings/not good writing style, I'm in my final year at uni and it's exam season so I've only given myself a brief break from revision to write this...the joys*

In just under 18 hours voting opens in the Birmingham Mayoral referendum. Luckily for me I know quite a lot about the Birmingham Mayoral debate; I’ve attended events, read blog posts and local news articles, met potential candidates and personally heard from both sides of the divide. The vast majority of citizens of Birmingham, however, haven’t. The first time that most people I know heard about it (apart from for those exposed to my incessant chatter on the subject) was when their polling cards arrived. As well as being a pretty bad failing on the half of the council who should, whether they want a mayor or not, be committed to encouraging democratic engagement in the city it has led to a significant amount of confusion, misapprehension and frustration amongst my friends and colleagues. So, rather than talking at unfortunate bystanders, filling up facebook and twitter feeds and generally driving my friends and family nuts I’ve decided to do a brief as possible blog on the one reason that, above all else, I think we should have a mayor: accountability.



As some of you may know and some may be surprised to find out the city council’s annual budget is approximately £3.5billion. This, given that the population of Birmingham is around 1,036,900, works out as roughly £3375 per citizen per year. This is a vast amount of money. Up until recently the budget was even bigger, £4billion a year. Can you name any of the 120 councillors who decide what this mindbogglingly vast sum gets spent on? I can’t.

There’s no doubt that Birmingham has not been using its resources entirely efficiently over the past few years. Take for example the Birmingham city council website: back in 2009 the original estimated cost of overhauling the outdated design and moving more services online (in order, in theory, to save money) was £580,000. The final cost, taking into account delays in getting services up and running, was an estimated £6million. And then the council announced plans to outsource 100 IT jobs to India (a number later cut down to around 55 due to public outrage).

Now, we move on the current plans for the Birmingham metro. Don’t get me wrong, a council project that will create an estimated 1,300 new jobs is a great idea. Paying £128million (£75.4million from the Department of Transport, £52.6million presumably from the council budget) to connect two stations that are a fifteen minute walk apart, isn’t. Especially since the only other places the metro currently goes are Wolverhampton, West Bromwich and Wednesbury (Wolverhampton being a 17minute train journey from New Street anyway). Call me crazy but this doesn't seem like the best possible use of public funds.

For every big spend in one area cuts have to be made elsewhere. As a keen women’s rights campaigner I’ve been shocked and horrified at the reduction in funds available for domestic abuse charities, especially when incidences of domestic violence have trebled over the last 18months (http://www.birminghampost.net/news/west-midlands-news/2012/04/30/number-of-domestic-violence-victims-in-birmingham-trebles-in-18-months-65233-30870775/?utm_source=twitterfeed&utm_medium=twitter). This is by no means the only area where cuts have been made but it serves to highlight my point: the way the council chooses to spend its budget really can change, and even save (or lose), lives.





Now, I haven’t highlighted these issues to condemn the city council: they have done a lot of good over the years and an elected Mayor will have just as much potential to cock up. The difference is if we don’t like what the Mayor does we will know who they are and we will be able to hold them accountable.

Right now we don’t know who is responsible for taking these decisions. If a Mayor messes up we’ll be able to identify the issue and vote them out at the next election. Councillors are essentially anonymous. We don’t really know who’s responsible for what. Mayors publish manifestos, councillors, for the most part, don’t. If Mayors breaks promises we know, if councillors do (if they made any promises in the first place), no one notices. We really need someone we can hold accountable when things go wrong so we can make damn sure that it does not happen again.

This might seem an oddly negative reason for electing a mayor, ‘we’ll know if they mess up’, but I think it is an important one and one that has not been largely touched on elsewhere in what I’ve read/heard so far. There are of course, many wholly positive reasons for voting ‘Yes’ tomorrow. These include, but are not limited to:

-        -   The Prime Minister is going to create a special cabinet for elected Mayors. If we have one they can gain influence in Westminster unheard of for our current city representatives and lobby for better provision for our city and the addressing of our cities issues. If we don’t, we won’t, where other cities will.

-        -  A Mayor will be mandated to represent the whole city, not just and individual ward, with a clear set of policies designed for the whole city, not just their immediate locality, so we can vote based on their plans for the city, not just the party they’re affiliated to.

However, rather than continue to vent my thoughts on this increasingly long  and disjointed blog post I will direct you to some other posts written by people who are much more articulate, and have a much better understanding of the Birmingham political scene than I do:

Marc Reeves on an elected mayor’s ability to provide a whole City Vision: http://www.thechamberlainfiles.com/elected-mayors-its-all-about-the-city-vision-stupid/
Kevin Johnson on the need to shake up the status quo: http://www.thechamberlainfiles.com/say-no-to-the-status-quo/

And in the interests of democracy the ‘No’ campaign website: http://www.votenotoapowerfreak.org.uk/

In conclusion I don’t believe an elected Mayor system is perfection itself. Personally I like the idea of so called ‘metro-mayors’ or regional Mayors that oversee the strategic development of regions, not just cities (something the West Midlands could definitely benefit from). However this is not on the cards and probably never will be unless we take this first step (that is if it ever is). An elected Mayor is not perfect, but it is a better system than the one we have now. As the saying goes ‘things don’t move unless you push them’. For me, an elected Mayor for Birmingham represents the first big step towards making local politics, well, interesting. Last year’s local election saw voter turnout in some constituencies of Birmingham drop as low as 23.9% (Ladywood, 2011) and our city is routinely ranked in the top 4 in the UK for high rates of unemployment. We need to reengage the citizens of this great city in politics, and we need a strong, visible leader to help tackle the issues we face strategically and on a city wide level, as well as representing us on a national or even international basis. And I believe that if we vote ‘Yes’ to a Birmingham Mayor tomorrow, we might just get it.



H.B.
x